search

Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Adrian Menendez-Maceiras Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Carabelli vs Menendez-Maceiras analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Adrian Menendez-Maceiras Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Carabelli 1 - 0 Menendez-Maceiras

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carabelli has won 48.68% of points on their second serve, while Menendez-Maceiras has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carabelli, in recent form, has won 55.65% of their opponent's second serve points, while Menendez-Maceiras has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.93% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Carabelli has saved 60.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Menendez-Maceiras has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Carabelli has won 67.12% of matches played (W/L 49/ 24), with Menendez-Maceiras winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Carabelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 287/ 159), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Menendez-Maceiras has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 319/ 210), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 14/ 23).
  • Player level: In the last year, Carabelli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 74.14% of matches (W/L 43/ 15), where as Menendez-Maceiras has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Carabelli winning 1 times and Menendez-Maceiras being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Carabelli winning 2 and Menendez-Maceiras winning 0. The last match between Carabelli and Menendez-Maceiras was at the Salinas Challenger, 23-04-2021, Quarterfinals, Hard with Camilo Ugo Carabelli getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:40:5.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Carabelli and Menendez-Maceiras have played a deciding set 0 times, with Carabelli winning 0 times and Menendez-Maceiras 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Carabelli winning 0, and Menendez-Maceiras 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carabelli has played against opponents with an average rank of 280.96 while Menendez-Maceiras has played against players with an average rank of 144.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carabelli has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Menendez-Maceiras has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Carabelli has converted 46.73% of breakpoint opportunities, and Menendez-Maceiras has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365
Camilo Ugo Carabelli

10

Total

0

Mast

6

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

4

Minor

110

Rank

96

High

24

Age

R

Plays

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

865

Rank

111

High

38

Age

R

Plays

Adrian Menendez-Maceiras

13

Total

0

Mast

4

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

9

Minor

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W L L W L W L L L L

Form

L W W L W W W L L L

63% (316-184)

Career Total W/L

55% (608-500)

66% (27-14)

YTD W/L

0% (0-0)

$130,440

Career Prize Money

$504,829

2

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Carabelli VS Menendez-Maceiras H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Camilo Ugo Carabelli Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 0
Games Won 12 8
Aces (Total) 2 1
DFs (Total) 1 2
Avg Match Time 1:40:5 1:40:5
1st Serve % 64% (41/64) 70% (42/60)
1st Serve Win% 76% (31/41) 62% (26/42)
2nd Serve Win% 43% (10/23) 39% (7/18)
BPs Won% (Total) 67% (4/6) 25% (2/8)
Return Points W% 45% (27/60) 36% (23/64)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Carabelli VS Menendez-Maceiras H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-4 6-4
cross
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
64% ( 41 of 64)
1st Serve %
70% ( 42 of 60)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
76% ( 31 of 41)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 26 of 42)
43% ( 10 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 7 of 18)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
25% ( 2 of 8)
36% ( 23 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 27 of 60)
68
Total Points Won
56

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Camilo Ugo Carabelli Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
YTD W/L 66% (27/14) 0% (0/0)
Sets Win/Loss 60% (56/37) 0% (0/0)
Games Win/Loss 54% (493/425) 0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss 67% (2/1) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 66% (25/13) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.21 0
Aces Total 95 0
DFs per game 0.19 0
DFs Total 85 0
Avg Match Time 1st Match 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 237.41 0
1st Serve % 63% (1864/2965) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve W% 67% (1257/1864) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve W% 49% (536/1101) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% Total 47% (150/321) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts W% 42% (1264/2994) 0% (0/0)
Slam W/L 50% (2/2) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 33% (1/2) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 43% (3/4) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 78% (21/6) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 64% (25/39) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 50% (10/20) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 73% (8/11) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (23/23) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (23/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 22% (18/4) 0% (0/0)

Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
Q1
cross
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
59% ( 41 of 70)
1st Serve %
57% ( 38 of 67)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68% ( 28 of 41)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 24 of 38)
66% ( 19 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 16 of 29)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
33% ( 23 of 70)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 27 of 67)
74
Total Points Won
63
L
7-6(1) 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
65% ( 40 of 62)
1st Serve %
55% ( 33 of 60)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70% ( 28 of 40)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 20 of 33)
45% ( 10 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 10 of 27)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
39% ( 24 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 30 of 60)
68
Total Points Won
54
L
6-4 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62% ( 41 of 66)
1st Serve %
57% ( 39 of 68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76% ( 31 of 41)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 25 of 39)
48% ( 12 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
34% ( 10 of 29)
80% ( 4 of 5)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
35% ( 23 of 66)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 33 of 68)
76
Total Points Won
58
L
7-6(1) 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
39% ( 14 of 36)
1st Serve %
46% ( 25 of 54)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
86% ( 12 of 14)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 15 of 25)
73% ( 16 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 9 of 29)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
22% ( 8 of 36)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 30 of 54)
58
Total Points Won
32
L
6-3 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Taro Daniel
52% ( 29 of 56)
1st Serve %
57% ( 45 of 79)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
55% ( 16 of 29)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 23 of 45)
37% ( 10 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 11 of 34)
41% ( 7 of 17)
Break Points Won
63% ( 5 of 8)
54% ( 30 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 45 of 79)
71
Total Points Won
64
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
74% ( 57 of 77)
1st Serve %
65% ( 59 of 91)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
86% ( 49 of 57)
1st Serve Won
76% ( 45 of 59)
65% ( 13 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
69% ( 22 of 32)
0% ( 0 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
19% ( 15 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
26% ( 24 of 91)
86
Total Points Won
82
L
7-6(4) 7-6(6) H2H
Q1
cross
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
57% ( 43 of 75)
1st Serve %
68% ( 60 of 88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72% ( 31 of 43)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 38 of 60)
63% ( 20 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 12 of 28)
15% ( 2 of 13)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 5)
32% ( 24 of 75)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 38 of 88)
89
Total Points Won
74
W
6-4 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64% ( 45 of 70)
1st Serve %
54% ( 56 of 103)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78% ( 35 of 45)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 37 of 56)
60% ( 15 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 21 of 47)
12% ( 2 of 17)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
29% ( 20 of 70)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 45 of 103)
95
Total Points Won
78
L
7-6(2) 6-4 H2H
SF
cross
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
73% ( 37 of 51)
1st Serve %
59% ( 50 of 85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68% ( 25 of 37)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 31 of 50)
71% ( 10 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 13 of 35)
31% ( 4 of 13)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
31% ( 16 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 41 of 85)
76
Total Points Won
60
L
6-4 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Orlando Luz
60% ( 50 of 83)
1st Serve %
60% ( 53 of 89)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
58% ( 29 of 50)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 39 of 53)
70% ( 23 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 17 of 36)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
37% ( 31 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 33 of 89)
85
Total Points Won
87
W
1-6 7-5 6-4 H2H

Adrian Menendez-Maceiras Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R1
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
51% ( 62 of 121)
1st Serve %
56% ( 65 of 116)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
0
73% ( 45 of 62)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 44 of 65)
59% ( 35 of 59)
2nd Serve Won
59% ( 30 of 51)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
43% ( 3 of 7)
34% ( 41 of 121)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 42 of 116)
122
Total Points Won
115
L
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(2) H2H
Q1
cross
Stuart Parker
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
69% ( 35 of 51)
1st Serve %
57% ( 27 of 47)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
74% ( 26 of 35)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 15 of 27)
56% ( 9 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 7 of 20)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
31% ( 16 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 25 of 47)
60
Total Points Won
38
L
6-4 6-0 H2H
R2
cross
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
61% ( 27 of 44)
1st Serve %
61% ( 31 of 51)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74% ( 20 of 27)
1st Serve Won
45% ( 14 of 31)
59% ( 10 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 9 of 20)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
32% ( 14 of 44)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 28 of 51)
58
Total Points Won
37
L
6-1 4-1 ret. H2H
R1
cross
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Daniil Glinka
67% ( 62 of 92)
1st Serve %
61% ( 55 of 90)
3
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
3
73% ( 45 of 62)
1st Serve Won
76% ( 42 of 55)
57% ( 17 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
49% ( 17 of 35)
33% ( 2 of 6)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
33% ( 30 of 92)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 31 of 90)
93
Total Points Won
89
W
6-4 3-6 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Skander Mansouri
71% ( 67 of 95)
1st Serve %
61% ( 64 of 105)
0
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
6
75% ( 50 of 67)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 47 of 64)
57% ( 16 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 18 of 41)
22% ( 2 of 9)
Break Points Won
13% ( 1 of 8)
31% ( 29 of 95)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 40 of 105)
106
Total Points Won
94
W
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) H2H
Q1
cross
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Ben Jones
76% ( 32 of 42)
1st Serve %
63% ( 34 of 54)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
9
78% ( 25 of 32)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 18 of 34)
70% ( 7 of 10)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 10 of 20)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
24% ( 10 of 42)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 26 of 54)
58
Total Points Won
38
W
6-2 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Jakub Mensik
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
43% ( 20 of 47)
1st Serve %
60% ( 30 of 50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
70% ( 14 of 20)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 17 of 30)
63% ( 17 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 7 of 20)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
34% ( 16 of 47)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 26 of 50)
57
Total Points Won
40
L
6-3 4-0 ret. H2H
QF
cross
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
67% ( 34 of 51)
1st Serve %
64% ( 39 of 61)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
71% ( 24 of 34)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 22 of 39)
53% ( 9 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 9 of 22)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
35% ( 18 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 30 of 61)
63
Total Points Won
49
W
6-2 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Matthew William Donald
61% ( 31 of 51)
1st Serve %
67% ( 37 of 55)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
58% ( 18 of 31)
1st Serve Won
46% ( 17 of 37)
65% ( 13 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
28% ( 5 of 18)
60% ( 6 of 10)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
39% ( 20 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 33 of 55)
64
Total Points Won
42
W
6-4 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
54% ( 32 of 59)
1st Serve %
60% ( 37 of 62)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
75% ( 24 of 32)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 21 of 37)
56% ( 15 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 12 of 25)
80% ( 4 of 5)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
34% ( 20 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 29 of 62)
68
Total Points Won
53
L
6-2 6-4 H2H

Carabelli Vs Menendez-Maceiras Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions